Selected Issues of Public Economic Law in Theory, Judicature and Practice in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia

Edited by
Andrzej Powałowski
Marián Vrabko
Petr Mrkývka

WYDAWNICTWO C.H.BECK
WARSZAWA 2017

Selected Issues of Public Economic Law in Theory, Judicature and Practice in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia

Recenzenci / Peer Reviewers:
Prof. JUDr. Hana Marková, CSc.
Prof. JUDr. Peter Škultéty, DrSc
Dr hab. Zbigniew Bukowski

Redaktor prowadzący / Coordinating Academic Editor:
Prof. UG Dr hab. Andrzej Powałowski

Redaktorzy naukowi / Academic Editors:
Prof. UG Dr hab. Andrzej Powałowski (Polish Part)
Doc. JUDr. Petr Mrkývka, Ph.D. (Czech Part)
Prof. JUDr. Marián Vrabko, CSc. (Slovak Part)

Wydanie publikacji zostało dofinansowane przez Wydział Prawa i Administracji
Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego oraz Fundację Rozwoju Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego

Artykuły składające się na tę książkę zostały opublikowane w oryginalnej formie, dostarczonej przez Autorów.
Wydawca i redakcja nie ponosi odpowiedzialności za ich treść, jakość lub poprawność.

The articles in this book are published as originally provided by the Authors.
Neither the publisher nor editor bear responsibility for the articles’ content, quality or accuracy.

© Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck 2017

Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck Sp. z o.o.
ul. Bonifraterska 17, 00-203 Warszawa

www.ksiegarnia.beck.pl

Skład i łamanie: Jolanta Straszewska
Przygotowanie wersji elektronicznej: Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck

ISBN: 978-83-255-1130-2

Bibliography

Argument report to Act No. 300/2008 Coll., on electronic acts and authorized document conversion, as amended, available at http://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?O=5&CT=445&CT1=0.

Babiarz S., Czarnik Z., Janda P., Pełczyński P., Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz (Public Procurement Law. Second Edition Commentary), Warsaw 2011.

Baehr J. (ed.), Komentarz do ustawy o odnawialnych źródłach energii (Commentary to the law on renewable energy sources), Lex/el 2016.

Bandarzewski K., Rozwój regionalny – instrumenty realizacji i rola samorządu województwa (Regional development – instruments of implementation and the role of the voivodship self-government), Warsaw 2015.

Bazan A., Nowicki J.E., Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz (Public Procurement Law. Commentary), Warsaw 2015.

Beneš I., Energetická bezpečnost: informační příručka (Energy security: Information Guide) Hluboká nad Vltavou 2007.

Binhack P. et al., Energetická bezpečnost ČR a budoucnost energetické politiky EU. Zkrácená verze (Energy security of the Czech Republic and future EU energy policy. Short version), Praha 2010.

Blažo O., Directive on Antitrust Damages Actions and Current Changes of Slovak Competition and Civil Law, Yearbook Antitrust Regulatory Studies 215, No. 259.

Blažo O., Zodpovednosť za správne delikty (Responsibility for Proper Offences), [in:] Blažo O., Kalesná K., Zákon o ochrane hospodárskej súťaže komentár, Praha 2012.

Bobrow D.B., Haliżak E., Zięba R. (eds.), Bezpieczeństwo narodowe i międzynarodowe u schyłku XX wieku (National and international security at the end of the twentieth century), Warsaw 1997.

Brůha D., Prošková E., Zdravotnická povolání (Health Care Professions), Praha 2012.

Buzan B.W., Wilde J. O. De, Bezpečnost. Nový rámec pro analýzu (Safety. A new framework for analysis). Brno 2005.

Cepek B., et al. Environmentálne právo Všeobecná a osobitná časť (Environmental Law. General and Special Part), Aleš Čeňek 2015.

Cepek B., Implementácia medzinárodných a komunitárnych environmentálnych noriem (Implementation of international and community environmental standards), Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae 2009, Vol. 83.

Cepek, B. et al., Environmentálne právo. Všeobecná a osobitná časť (Environmental Law. General and Special Section), Plzeň 2015.

Chmaj M. (ed.), Zamówienia publiczne. Podręcznik (Public procurement. Manual), Warsaw 2010.

Churski P., Perdał R., Herodowicz T., Rola środków polityki spójności pozyskiwanych przez samorząd terytorialny w rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczym ośrodków regionalnych w Polsce (The role of cohesion policy funds acquired by territorial self-government in the socio-economic development of regional centers in Poland), Samorząd Terytorialny 2016, No. 7–8.

Čtvrtník P., Galuška J., Tošnerová P., Poštovnictví v Čechách, na Moravě a ve Slezsku (Postal services in Bohemia, Moravia na Silesia), Liberec 2008.

Czajkowski T. (ed.), Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz (Public Procurement Law. Commentary), Warsaw 2004.

Czarnik Z., Glosa do wyroku NSA z dnia 11 sierpnia 2005 r., II GSK 105/05 (Annotation to the Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of 11 August 2005, II GSK 105/05), Samorząd Terytorialny 2006, No. 5.

Czudek, D., Delivering and Data Boxes in Tax Administration, [in:] The IABPAD Conference Proceedings. Orlando, The International Academy of Business and Public Administration Disciplines, 2011.

Czudek, D., Electronisation of the Public Administration primarily focusing on the Data boxes, [in:] New Economic Challenges – 3rd International Ph.D. Students Conference, Brno 2010.

Czudek. D., Chalupecká K., Změny v doručování po 1.7.2009 se zaměřením na správu daní (Changes in delivery after July 1, 2009 focusing on tax administration), [in:] COFOLA 2010: the Conference Proceedings, Brno 2010.

Damohorský M., et al., Právo životního prostředí (Environmental law), C.H. Beck 2003.

Dančák B., Závěšický J. (ed.), Energetická Bezpečnost a zájmy České republiky (Energy security and interests of the Czech Republic), Brno 2007.

Dercz M., [in:] Dercz M., Rek T., Ustawa o działalności leczniczej. Komentarz (Medical Activity Act. Commentary), Warsaw 2015.

Doležal T., Vybrané právní aspekty spojené se smluvním charakterem poskytování zdravotních služeb (Selected legal aspects of contractual nature of delivery of medical services), Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky, Akademie věd České republiky – Ústav státu a práva, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 3.

Doležal T., Vztah lékaře a pacienta z pohledu soukromého práva (Relation between Physician and Patient under Auspices of Private Law), Praha 2012.

Domagała M., Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne. Aspekty administracyjno-prawne (Energy security. Administrative and legal aspects), Lublin 2008.

Dyląg A., Odpłatne udzielanie świadczeń zdrowotnych (Paid health services), Państwo i Prawo 2013, No. 1.

Dyląg A., Przekształcenie samodzielnego publicznego zakładu opieki zdrowotnej jako forma prywatyzacji zadań publicznych (Transformation of an independent public health care facility as an example of the privatisation of public administration services), Toruń 2014.

Fedorowicz M., Finansowanie inwestycji samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce za pomocą środków z funduszy strukturalnych (Financing of territorial self-government investments in Poland by means of structural funds), [w:] Inwestycje Samorządu Terytorialnego, Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Administracji Publicznej w Szczecinie 2009, No. 1.

Foltán, V., Sociálna farmácia a zdravotníctvo. Učebnica pre študentov farmaceutickej fakulty (Social Pharmacy and Health Care. Textbook for Students of the Faculty of Pharmacy) Osveta, spol. s. r. o. Martin v spolupráci s Farmaceutickou fakultou UK, 2010.

Gašparec I., Leniency program alebo cesta ako, sa vyhnúť pokutám z kartelovej dohody, available at www.epravo.sk/top/clanky/leniency-program-alebo-cesta-ako-sa-vyhnut-pokutam-z-kartelovej-dohody-32.html.

Gavalec M., Judikatúra vo veciach životného prostredia (Case law on environmental matters), Wolters Kluwer 2015.

Gawrońska-Baran A., Smerd A., Hryc-Ląd A., Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz do nowelizacji (Public Procurement Law. Amendment Commentary), Wiedza i Praktyka 2016.

Hanák J., Ochrana životního prostředí při nakládání s odpady (Waste Management in Respect to Environmental Protection), [in:] Jančářová I., Dudová J., Hanák J., Pekárek M., Prŭchová I., Tkáčiková J., Právo životního prostředí: zvláštní část. 1. (Environmental law: a specific part. 1), Brno 2015.

Hartung W., Zamówienia in house (In-house Orders), Zamówienia Publiczne. Doradca 2016, No. 7.

Hegyi L., Bielik I. et al., Základy verejného zdravotníctva (Fundamentals of Public Health), Bratislava 2011.

Hodás M., In house výnimka v novom zákone o verejnom obstarávaní. (In-house exemption in public procurement in the new Act on public procurement), Právny obzor 2016, Vol. 99, No. 2.

Horubski K., Wykonywanie zadań własnych przez jednostki samorządu terytorialnego a stosowanie przepisów o udzielaniu zamówień publicznych w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości (Performing Own Tasks by Local Government Units and the Implementation of the Public Procurement Regulations in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice), Samorząd Terytorialny 2006, No. 10.

Humenik, I., Ochrana osobnosti a medicínske pravo (Protection of personality and Medical Law), Bratislava 2011.

Humlíčková P., Vomáčka V., Zahumenská V., Novela procesu EIA – více otázek než odpovědí (Amendments to the EIA Procedure – More Questions than Answers), České právo životního prostředí : časopis České společnosti pro právo životního prostředí, Česká společnost pro právo životního prostředí 2015.

Jagielski J., Kontrola administracji publicznej (Public Administration Control), Warsaw 2007.

Jančářová I., Environmental Law. Selected international treaties and Czech national regulations, Brno 2006.

Jančářová I., Hanák J., Vomáčka V., Property and Environmental Protection in Czechia, [in:] Winter G. (ed.), Property and Environmental Protection in Europe, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2016.

Jančářová I., Právní prostředky a cesty k řešení starých ekologických zátěží (Legal Instruments and Ways to Solve Old Environmental Contamination), Brno 2008.

Jančářová I., Prǔchová I., Pekárek M., Bahýl’ová L., Vomáčka V., Odpovědnost v právu životního prostředí - současný stav a perspektivy (Liability in Environmental Law – Current State and Perspectives), Brno 2013.

Jančářová I., Zidek D., Permit procedures for industrial installations and infrastructure projects: Assessing integration and speeding up Czech Republic, available at http://avosetta.jura.uni-bremen.de/czechrepquest2016.pdf.

Janczewski L., Colarik A., Managerial Guide for Handling Cyber-Terrorism and Information Warfare, London 2005.

Janků M., Mikušová J., Veřejné podpory v soutěžním právu EU (Public support in EU competition law), Praha 2012.

Ježová D., Aktuálne rozhodnutie Súdneho Dvora Európskej únie týkajúce sa prípadu pezinskej skládky (The current decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the Pezin landfill case), available at http://projustice.sk/europske-pravo/aktualne-rozhodnutie-sudneho-dvora-eu-tykajuce-sa-pripadu-pezinskej-skladky.

Jurkowska-Gomułka A., [in:] Wróbel A. (ed.), Traktat o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz (The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Commentary), Warsaw 2012.

Kaczmarski M., Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Unii Europejskiej (Energy security of the European Union), Warsaw 2010.

Kalesná K., Generálne klauzuly v súťažnom práve (General Clauses in Competition Law), Právny obzor 2016, No. 79.

Kata R., Fundusze Unii Europejskiej jako instrument stymulowania spójności społeczno-gospodarczej regionów Polski Wschodniej (Funds of the European Union as an instrument to stimulate the socio-economic cohesion of the regions of Eastern Poland), Finanse Komunalne 2016, No. 10.

Kitler W., Bezpieczeństwo narodowe RP. Podstawowe kategorie. Uwarunkowania. System (National security RP. Basic categories. Conditions. System), Warsaw 2011.

Kohutek K., Komentarz do art. 23 rozporządzenia 1/2003 (Commentary to Article 23 of Regulation 1/2003), LEX/el.

Kohutek K., Sieradzka M., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz (The Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary), Warsaw 2008.

Kolasiński M.K., Wspólnotowa polityka zwalniania z grzywien i zmniejszania ich wysokości w sprawach kartelowych po reformie z 2006 r. (EU Policy on Immunity from Fines and Reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases after the 2006 Reform), EPS 2008, No. 6.

Koščík, M., Datové schránky – Byly naplněny cíle právní regulace? (Data Boxes – Have the legal regulation objectives been met?), [in:] COFOLA 2010. The Conference Proceedings, Brno 2010.

Košičiarová S. et al., Právo životného prostredia (Environmental Law), Eurokódex and Aleš Čeňek 2009.

Košičiarová S., Právne postavenie vlastníka podľa predpisov o ochrane prírody a krajiny (Legal status of the owner according to the Nature and Landscape Protection Regulations), [in:] Pocta profesorovi Gašparovi, Košice 2008.

Košičiarová S., Srebalová M., Vlastnícke právo a ochrana životného prostredia (Proprietary law and environmental protection), Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae 2003, Vol. 85.

Košičiarová, S. et al., Právo životného prostredia (Environmental Law), Žilina 2009.

Kowalak T., Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne – zaklęcie, wytrych czy realna kategoria (Energy security – spell, skeleton key or a real category), Biuletyn URE 2005, No. 6.

Kowalewski E. (ed.), Kompensacja szkód wynikłych ze zdarzeń medycznych. Problematyka cywilnoprawna i ubezpieczeniowa (Compensatory damages for medical failures. Civil law and insurance perspective), Toruń 2011.

Králik A., Uplatňovanie programu zhovievavosti (leniency) v Európskej únii a na Slovensku (Applying the Leniency Program in the European Union and Slovakia), Bulletin slovenskej advokácie 2011, No. 32.

Kramář J., Historie československé a české pošty. Československá pošta za první republiky (Czechoslovakian Postal Services during the First Republic), available at: www.ceskaposta.cz/o-ceske-poste/historie#1 03-03-2017.

Krasuski A., Prawo telekomunikacyjne. Komentarz (Telecommunications Law. A commentary), Warsaw 2015.

Křepelka F., Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland. Medicine, Law & Society 2016, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Křepelka F., Different Approaches to Cross Border Mobility of Patients in the European Union in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland, Medicine, Law & Society, Maribor: University of Maribor Press, 2016, Vol. 9, No. 2, doi:10.18690/24637955.9.1.101-120.

Křepelka F., Evropské zdravotnické právo (European Health Care Law), Praha 2004.

Křepelka F., Právní aspekty léčitelství v mezinárodní a evropské perspective (Legal aspects of natural healing in international and European perspective), Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky (Journal of Medical Law and Ethics), Akademie věd České republiky – Ústav státu a práva, 2016, Vol. 6, No. 3.

Křepelka F., Privatisierung in Gesundheitswesen in Tschechien und in der Slowakei unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Europarechts, [in:] Sander G., Tichý L. (eds.), Öffentliche Dienstleistungen in Deutschland und Ostmitteleuropa im Spannungsfeld von Daseinsvorsorge und Wettbewerb, Hamburg 2012.

Křepelka K., Privatisierung in Gesundheitswesen in Tschechien und in der Slowakei unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Europarechts (Privatisation in Health Care in Czechia and in Slovakia with Specific Consideration of European Law), [in:] Sander G., Tichy L. (eds.), Öffentliche Dienstleistungen in Deutschland und Ostmitteleuropa im Spannungsfeld von Daseinsvorsorge und Wettbewerb, Hamburg 2012.

Król-Bogomilska M., Kary pieniężne w prawie antymonopolowym (Fines in Antitrust Law), Warsaw 2001.

Kružíková E., Adamová E., Komárek J., Právo životního prostředí Evropských společenství. Praktický průvodce (Environmental law of the European Communities. Practical Guidebook), Praha 2003.

Kubot Z., Status kierownika samodzielnego zakładu opieki zdrowotnej (The Status of the Director of an Independent Health Care Entity), Wrocław 2001.

Lang P., Nosko A., Schneider J., Energetická bezpečnost a Statni energetická koncepce (Energy security and state energy concept), Commissioned Analysis of Czech Energy Policy, Praha 2009.

Leszczyński M., Bezpieczeństwo społeczne Polaków wobec wyzwań XXI wieku (Social security of Poles towards the challenges of the twenty-first century), Warsaw 2011.

Lindtnerova O., Geológia kaustobiolitov. Uhlie a uhľovodíky (Geology Caustobioliths. Coal and hydrocarbons), Bratislava 2009.

Litwiński P., [in:] Podrecki P., (ed.), Prawo Internetu (Internet Law), Warsaw 2004.

Mach J. (ed.), Zdravotnictví a právo: komentované předpisy (Health Care and Law: Commented Laws), Praha 2005.

Main Office of Statistics (GUS), Efektywność wykorzystania energii w latach 2004–2014, Informacje i opracowania statystyczne (Energy efficiency in Poland in years 2004–2014), Warsaw 2016.

Main Office of Statistics (GUS), Energia (Energy), Warsaw 2016.

Main Office of Statistics (GUS), Energia ze źródeł odnawialnych w 2014 (Energy from renewable sources in 2014, Warsaw 2015.

Mazurek G., Skarga do Sądu Okręgowego jako drugi poziom środków ochrony prawnej. Komentarz praktyczny (A Complaint to the District Court as a Second Level of Legal Protection. Practical Commentary), LEX/el.

McQuade III. S., Encyclopedia of Cybercrime, Greenwood 2008.

Mednis A., Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych. Komentarz (The Act on the Protection of Personal Data. A Commentary), Warsaw 1999.

Michta M., Michta D., Oferowanie przez operatora wyznaczonego usług pocztowych w postępowaniu o udzielenie zamówienia publicznego prowadzonego przez jednostkę sektora finansów publicznych (Offering of postal services by the designated operator in public procurment procedurę conducted by public sector entity), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego 2016, No. 3.

Miłosz M., Polish regulations on the protection of personal data with regard to the services provided by electronic means, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 2008, No. 5.

Miłosz, M., Personal data protection on the internet under the Polish law, [in:] Warner R., Barczewski M., Miłosz M. (eds.), Selected Papers on High Technology Law, Gdańsk–Chicago 2006.

Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic, Energy Policy 2014, available at http://www.rokovania.sk/File.aspx/ViewDocumentHtml/Mater-Dokum-168597?prefixFile.

Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Licensing process of renewable energy sources, available at www.sysnet.cz/C125774C00336141/cz/povolovani_a_predpisy/$FILE/Povolovaci_proces_OZE_2010_01_13.pdf.

Ministry of Industry and Trade of Czech Republic, Zpráva o životním prostředí České republiky 2014 (Environment Report of the Czech Republic in 2014), available at www.mzp.cz/cz/news_151120_Zprava_o_ZP_2014.

Ministry of Industry and Trade of Czech Republic, Zpráva o životním prostředí České republiky 2011, Environment Report of the Czech Republic in 2011, available at www.mzp.cz/cz/news_121213_zprava_ZP.

Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, State Energy Policy of the Czech Republic, available at www.mpo.cz/dokument158012.html.

Muras Z., Gmina a lokalny rynek energii elektrycznej i ciepła uwarunkowania prawne (Legal conditions of the municipality and the local market for electricity and heat), Energetyka 2003, No. 6.

Musil P., Globální energetický problém a hospodářská politika: se zaměřením na obnovitelné zdroje energie (The global energy problem and economic policy: a focus on renewable energy), Praha 2009.

Nesterowicz M. (ed.), Bagińska E., Śliwka M., Świderska M., Wałachowska M., Ustawa o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta. Komentarz (The Act on the Patient’s Rights and the Patients Rights Advocate. Commentary), Warsaw 2010.

Nowak–Kubiak J., Ustawa o działalności leczniczej, Komentarz (Medical Activity Act, Commentary), Warsaw 2012.

Nowicki H., Nowicki P., Zamówienia “in house” i ich dopuszczalność w ustawie Prawo zamówień publicznych z perspektywy orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej” (In-house Orders and Their Admissibility in the Public Procurement Law from the Perspective of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice), [in:] Borowicz A., Królikowska-Olczak M., Sadowy J., Starzyńska W., Ekonomiczne i prawne zagadnienia zamówień publicznych. Polska na tle Unii Europejskiej. Międzynarodowa konferencja naukowa 21–22 czerwca 2010 r. w Łodzi (Economic and Legal Aspects of Public Procurement. Poland and the European Union. International Scientific Conference 21–22 June 2010 in Łódź), Warsaw 2010.

Nowicki H., Zamówienia in house na tle nowych rozwiązań normatywnych (In-house Orders in View of New Normative Solutions), Prawo Zamówień Publicznych. Kwartalnik 2015, No. 4.

Okólski M. (ed.), Jaki model rynku energii? (Which model of energy market?), Warsaw 2001.

Olszewski P. (ed.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe. Wyzwania i zagrożenia XXI wieku (International security. Challenges and threats of the twenty-first century), Radom 2009.

Pawełczyk M. (ed.), Prawo energetyczne. Komentarz (Energy law. Commentary), Poznań 2012.

Piątek S., Prawo telekomunikacyjne. Komentarz (Telecommunications Law. A commentary), Warsaw 2013.

Podešva V., Act on Award of Public Procurements. Act on Registrar of contracts. Commentary, Prague 2016.

Popowska B. (ed.), Funkcje współczesnej administracji gospodarczej. Księga dedykowana Profesor Teresie Rabskiej (Functions of modern economic administration. The book dedicated to Professor Teresa Rabska), Poznań 2006.

Prokop J., Praktyka zwalczania karteli w Unii Europejskiej (The Practice of Preventing Cartels in the European Union), Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego No. 750, Współczesne problemy ekonomiczne 2012, No. 4.

Prorok I., [in:] Energetická bezpečnost – geopolitické souvislosti (Energy security –geopolitical context), Praha 2008.

Protasowicki I., Czepielewski S., Księżopolski K., Jurasz W., Raport Bezpieczeństwo Energetyczne, Polskie Narodowe Centrum Studiów Strategicznych, Podsumowanie panelu ekspertów (Energy Security, Polish National Center for Strategic Studies, panel of experts summary), Krynica Zdrój 2015, available at http://ncss.org.pl/images/PDF/Raport_Krynica.pdf.

Prudil L., Právo pro zdravotnické pracovníky (Law for Health Care Practitioners), Praha 2017.

Przeszło E., Kontrola udzielania zamówień publicznych (Public Procurement Control), Poznań 2013.

Rogalski, M. (ed.), Prawo telekomunikacyjne. Komentarz (Telecommunications Law. A commentary), Warsaw 2013.

Roggenkamp M. et al. (eds.) Energy Law in Europe. National, EU and International Regulation, New York 2007.

Semeniuk P., Syp S., Wylanie dziecka z kąpielą – czyli o leniency plus w Polsce (Throwing the baby out with the bath water – on Leniency Plus in Poland), Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 2013, No. 7(2).

Siewicz K., Tajemnica pocztowa i tajemnica telekomunikacyjna. Porównanie regulacji (Postal Secrecy and Telecommunications Confidentiality. A Comparison), Monitor Prawniczy 2015, No. 19.

Skoczny T. (ed.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji konsumentów. Komentarz (The Act on Competition and Consumers Protection. Commentary), Warsaw 2010.

Skubisz-Kalinowska L., Skarga na orzeczenie Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej, Zamówienia Publiczne (Complaints against the Decision of the National Appeals Chamber, Public Procurement) Zamówenia publiczne. Doradca 2012, No. 6.

Smejkal, V., Datové schránky nastupují (Data Boxes are coming up), Právní rádce 2009, No. 7.

Sobczak E., Wykorzystanie funduszy unijnych a spójność społeczno-ekonomiczna w rozwoju regionów (The use of EU funds and socio-economic cohesion in the development of regions), Warsaw 2012.

Sołtysiński S., Z doświadczeń programu leniency w Brukseli i w Warszawie (On the Experience of Leniency Program in Brussels and in Warsaw), [in:] Banasiński C. (ed.), Prawo konkurencji – stan obecny i kierunki zmian (Competition Law – Current Status and Trends), Warsaw 2006.

Soszyńska-Purtak P., Środki ochrony prawnej w zamówieniach publicznych. Komentarz praktyczny (Legal Protection in Public Procurement. Practical Commentary), Lex/el.

Spyra M., Koncesje w prawie energetycznym (Licence in Energy Law), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego 1998, No. 6.

Surówka K., Pozyskiwanie środków unijnych a problem zadłużenia jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w okresie 2007–2013. Wnioski dla władz samorządowych w nowej perspektywie (Acquisition of EU funds and the problem of indebtedness of territorial self-government units in the period 2007–2013. Applications for local government in a new perspective), Finanse Komunalne 2016, No. 5.

Šustek P., Holčápek T. (eds.), Zdravotnické právo (Health Care Law), Praha 2016.

Šustek P., Holčapek T., Hlaváček K., Hrdličková A., Jirásková K., Král J., Povolná M., Salač J., Široká L., Šolc M., Zdravotnické právo (Health care law), Praha 2016.

Svejkovký J., Vojtek P., Arnoštová L.T., Zdravotnictví a právo (Health care and law), Praha 2016.

Svejkovský P., Vojtek P., Arnoštová L.T., Zdravotnictví a právo (Health Care and Law), Praha 2016.

Swora M., Muras Z. (ed.), Prawo Energetyczne Komentarz Tom II (Energy Law Commentary Vol. II), Warsaw 2016.

Swora M., Muras Z. (ed.), Prawo Energetyczne Komentarz Tom I (Energy Law Commentary Vol. I), Warsaw 2016.

Szustakiewicz P., Kontrola zamówień publicznych. Zagadnienia praktyczne (Public Procurement Control. Practical Issues), Warsaw 2011.

Těšinová J., Žďárek R., Policar R., Medicínské právo (Medical Law), Praha 2017.

Těšinová J., Žďárek R., Policar R., Medicínské právo (Medical law), Praha 2011.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign inspiration related to the topic of cyber threats, Praha 2009, available at www.mvcr.cz/soubor/cyber-vyzkum-studie-zahranici-pdf.aspx.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International cooperation in the fight against crime information, Praha 2009, available at www.mvcr.cz/soubor/cyber-vyzkum-studie-mezinarodni-pdf.aspx.

Tóth, K. et al., Právo a zdravotníctvo II (Law and Healthcare II), Bratislava 2013.

Turno B., Leniency. Program łagodzenia kar w polskim prawie ochrony konkurencji (Leniency Program in the Polish Competition Law), Warsaw 2013.

Virová V., Výnimky z postupov verejného obstarávania: in-house entity podľa novej smernice 2014/24/EÚ o verejnom obstarávaní (In-house exemptions from public procurement according to new Directive 2014/24/EC), available at www.epravo.sk/top/clanky/vynimky-z-postupov-verejneho-obstaravania-in-house-entity-podla-novej-smernice-201424eu-o-verejnom-obstaravani-2099.html.

Vomácka V., Bahýl’ová L., Kocurek T., Zákon o posuzování vlivů na životní prostředí. Komentář (The Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Commentary), Praha 2015.

Vrabko M. et al., Správne pravo hmotné. Osobitná časť (Administrative Substantive Law. Special Section), Bratislava 2014.

Waisova S. et al. Současné otázky mezinárodní bezpečnosti (Current international security issues), Dobrá voda u Pelhřimova 2003.

Wilfling P., Zákon o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám. Komentár. Problémy z praxe. Rozhodnutia súdov (Freedom of Information Act. Comment. Problems from practice. Court decisions), Pezinok 2012.

Wlaźlak K., Glosa do wyroku TK z dnia 12 grudnia 2011 P 1/11 (Gloss to the Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 12 December 2011, P 1/11), Państwo i Prawo 2013, No. 8.

Wlaźlak K., Rozwój regionalny jako zadanie administracji publicznej (Regional development as a task of public administration), Warsaw 2010.

Wolska H., Zamówienia in house jako instrument oddziaływania na gospodarkę (In-house Orders as an Instrument for Influencing the Economy), [in:] Powałowski A. (ed.), Prawne instrumenty oddziaływania na gospodarkę (Legal Instruments of Influence on the Economy) Warsaw 2016.

Yergin D., Ensuring Energy Security, Foreign Affairs 2006, Vol. 85, No. 2.

Yergin D., Ensuring Energy Security, Foreign Affairs 2006, Vol. 85.

Zajíček M., Zeman K., Ekonomické dopady výstavby fotovoltaických a větrných elektráren v ČR (Economic impacts of photovoltaic and wind power plants in the Czech Republic), Praha 2010.

Zielińska, M., Nowa ustawa Prawo pocztowe – podstawowe rozwiązania regulacyjne (New Postal Law – basic regulatory solutions), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego 2014, No. 3.

Preface

Public economic law is a part of the legal system that includes standards whose subject is the state’s influence on the economy, including the regulation of the state’s behaviour towards business entities. It is the right of the state and its organs and apparatus to intervene in the economic sphere. It is an expression of the state’s power in the economy and reflects the state’s obligations such as determining the situation and legal position of entrepreneurs.

The law embraces legal relationships that occur between state bodies and business entities. The entities are not only the addressees of the state’s activities but also their initiators, awaiting appropriate actions to be taken by state authorities. What is included in the area of these legal relationships are the competences of state organs, a mechanism (procedures) for taking decisions and expressing a specific attitude (e.g. by establishing standards) and the rights and obligations of business entities along with the conditions and forms of their implementation and guarantees of protection. The formation of the indicated legal relationships is usually carried out by means of methods and instruments of an administrative-legal character applicable in legal relationships, although it is not rare that solutions used in civil law are also adopted.

Public economic law regulates in particular: the organization and functioning of infrastructure sectors in the economy including energy, telecommunications and postal services, as well as medical services sector, rules and forms of competition protection, opportunities for granting and making use of public aid, environmental protection issues connected with economic activity and public procurement. These issues were elaborated on by authors from the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, who – from the perspective of the law of individual states – prepared in this study the characteristics of the indicated issues. It is worth, it seems, getting to know the discussions devoted to various national problems of public economic law, at the same time bearing in mind the fact that these are the regulations of the European Union that constitute the basis and starting point for them.

Prof. UG, dr hab. Andrzej Powałowski

Part One. Energy Law.
Energy Security and Energy from Renewable Sources

Introduction

Marián Vrabko1

The term “energy industry” generally denotes a field which is concerned with the economic use of all energy sources and supplies.

Nowadays, we use different forms of energy, including their combinations, but the most frequent forms of energy used are water energy, wind energy, heat energy and nuclear energy.

The majority of energy may be used in a place where it originates and this is important for its use but it is not a decisive factor.

However, a much more effective use of energy takes place in a place designated in advance where, in a concentrated form, its transformation, exchange or sale is carried out. Here, the energy plays an important role as a commodity which may be transported freely and subsequently sold and purchased or processed and just then be sold and purchased, either in large or small amounts – for small consumers. We therefore talk about the transport of energy through various networks, referring thus to network industries. With respect to the legal regulation, we thus talk about the legal regulation of network industries.

The framework of legal regulation of network industries may be found in individual national constitutions and national legislation.

In the EU, this legal regulation is contained in the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, particularly its Title XVI entitled “Trans-European Networks”. Article 170 of the Treaty states that the European Union wants to contribute to the development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures, including the interconnection of national networks as well as the access to such networks.

We will not deal with the development of transport and telecommunications networks since these are subject to a specific legal regulation and operate more or less effectively. The situation is much more complicated with respect to energy infrastructure, naturally, including the specific features through which one can differentiate it from transport or telecommunications networks.

As we have already mentioned, energy networks have certain specific features which can be derived from the type of energy and also from the fact of whether the renewable or non-renewable energy sources are concerned.

A specific problem typical of them is their spontaneity and the fact that they are subsequently difficult to store and handle. These facts are frequently taken advantage of by supranational corporations in a cross-border trade.

Most proposals for legal regulation support the renewable sources. However, investors are many times not interested in them since it is rather expensive. Many investors thus prefer to invest in non-renewable sources.

Given these problems and other obstacles which tend to emerge, the construction of energy networks and development of energy market (especially electricity) in Europe is of a great importance at both the national as well as the European level.

The applicable legal regulation at the national and the European level should ensure the priority of electricity, preservation of its specific qualities, ensure the means of its transport and ensure the compliance of national interests with the supranational ones, in particular with the Union’s interests.

The transport and sale is generally related mainly to the market environment. Foreseeability and functionality is typical of such market environment.

At the European Union level, this practically means that it is necessary to create energy networks interconnection so that every entity in the EU could, whenever it needs to, purchase enough energy from the administered European energy network.

1 JUDr., SCs.

Energy Law and Renewable Resources of the Czech Republic

Michal Janovec1

1. Introduction

In this chapter, I will focus on two areas of energy law in the Czech Republic, that is: (i) energy security, which is a fundamental prerequisite for energy law; and (ii) the future of energy law, especially concerning the preservation of sufficient energy resources for a modern society.

The answer to challenges related to both issues mentioned above may lie in renewable resources, which are now used much more than they ever used to be, but the effectiveness of this use – also taking into account their potential negative impact on the environment – is still questionable.

2. Energy security of the Czech Republic

“Energy security is the availability of sufficient supplies at affordable prices”2, which means that one seeks the right balance between the amount of energy and the willingness to pay for it only as much as one thinks is still economically justified.

The three main aspects of energy security are as follows:

1. The security of obtaining energy resources;

2. The security of energy transformations and energy transport; and

3. The energy security of final users3.

Energy is a key precondition for any rate of economic growth and there is no doubt that the main source of energy. To promote and maintain its economic growth, it is necessary for every country to supply appropriate amount of energy for production, movement and everyday life of its citizens.

Energy security comprises of various levels of relations (between different groups of objects using energy named bellow), even though the degree of understanding the energy threat differs. The difference in interests is determined by an entity’s understanding of the term of energy security. Among different stakeholders, in terms of energy security, we can mainly distinguish:

– Producers (owners of energy sources);

– Distributors (entities that distribute energy resources or through which these resources are distributed);

– Consumers; and

– Other entities with particular interests on energy security (e.g. banks, car producers, scientific institutions and environmental organisations)4.

It is evident that the interests and objectives of the above-mentioned groups with regard to energy security are to some extent different. However, in principle, as regards security, the fundamental objective should be the same: ensuring sufficient production at the lowest price possible, while ensuring protection of energy resources, their distribution and subsequent consumption.

The energy sector and the related energy security is an important aspect of country’s security and one of the Czech Republic’s priorities. It is necessary to define a clear long-term energy policy, which will influence the future of the Czech Republic. The country’s vulnerability lies in the fact that it is largely dependent on supplies of energy from a single source and that the energy market is not sufficiently integrated. The Czech Republic largely builds on the security strategy of the EU and NATO, what is most visible in a document of the Ministry of Industry and Trade entitled “State Energy Policy”5. The document reflects requirements and proposals of the EU stemming mainly from the Lisbon Treaty and, in general, from the evolving throughout the recent years EU strategy and policy of the energy security.

In the State Energy Policy (hereinafter also referred to as the “SEP”) the Czech government defines a political, legislative and administrative framework for a reliable, affordable and sustainable energy supply. According to Section 3 of the Act on Energy Management6, the SEP is a strategic document expressing the state’s goals in the energy sector in line with the requirements of economic and social progress, including protection of the environment.

The State Energy Policy identifies five strategic priorities, which should contribute to the achievement of the top-level goals. The first priority includes a balanced mix of primary energy resources and electricity generation sources, with this mix being based on their broad portfolio and on effective use of all available domestic energy resources. Second priority is maintaining trade surplus with the EU with sufficient reserves and preserving available strategic reserves of domestic forms of energy. Third priority is increasing the energy efficiency of the national economy, developing the networks infrastructure of the Czech Republic in the context of Central European countries, reinforcing international cooperation and integration of electricity and gas markets in the region and promoting the creation of an effective and agile common energy policy of the EU. The remaining priorities include the support for research, development and innovation to ensure competitiveness of the Czech energy sector and the support for education with the aim to implement the necessary generation renewal and to improve the quality of technical intelligence in the energy sector.

Last, but not least, increasing the energy security and resistance of the Czech Republic and strengthening the ability to obtain the necessary energy supplies in the event of frequent breakdowns, multiple attacks against critical infrastructure and long-lasting crises in fuel supplies.

2.1. Energy risks

The security risks the Czech Republic is facing in the field of energy can be classified as: (a) technical (interruptions in the supply of primary energy feedstock as a result of breakdowns or accidents in the production or transfer of energy); (b) economic (ensuing from the character or non-existence of the market); and (c) political (related to the regulatory environment, national industrial incentive policy or assumption of foreign policy obligations).

From a general viewpoint, when providing for energy security it is necessary, as far as possible, to follow one core principle: avoiding the absolute dependence on a single source in any segment of strategic raw materials. In the Czech Republic’s case this means not exceeding, if possible, the high proportion of oil and gas supplies from Russia (in 2015, this proportion was 56.4% both for oil and natural gas7) and efforts should be made rather to reduce this proportion in favour of a different supplier. From the viewpoint of energy security, the best-case scenario is not to take more than 30% of the total volume from a single supplier.

With regard to the fact that traditional energy resources and their reserves are finite, it is necessary to diversify resources and achieve a certain ideal energy mix, especially in the field of nuclear energy or potential limited renewable resources. Another goal is to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and search for more effective solutions – research and new technologies with the aim to reduce energy intensity and seek economically viable alternative sources of energy that are friendly to the environment.

In general, it is possible to divide the need for energy into 3 parts: households, industry and transport. As regards transport, there is an evident substantial dependence on oil and oil products, and the Czech Republic imports almost all its oil capacity from abroad. The same is the case for natural gas and, therefore, it is necessary to look for ways of avoiding the growth of dependency8 on these imports and, thus, increasing energy security at the same time. According to the SEP, what makes the Czech energy mix different from the neighbouring countries is the generation of electricity. The Czech Republic is self-reliant in terms of both households and industry. What more it even exports roughly 25% of electric power to other countries. Therefore, it could be argued that considering electric energy sources, the Czech Republic is safe.

What is or, what can be, an energy security issue is the relatively uncompetitive environment in the gas or electricity market because the company RWE Transgas supplies most of it. The main threat is cancelling diversification of supplies from Norway, with the Czech Republic having no strategic stockpile of gas and with gas storage facilities in the Czech Republic being controlled by privately owned companies. Short diversification of gas energy supplies is not the direction that the Czech Republic should take, because it represents potential future threat.

2.2. Energy security in the future

It has been identified that the main challenges for the Czech Republic’s energy security are a possible lack of coal for Czech combined heat and power plants and power plants as a result of mining limits; the rising costs of the use of coal as a result of the levying of full-scale charges for emission credits by the year 2020; the trend of replacing coal with imported natural gas and the related increase in the Czech Republic’s import dependency; postponing the expansion of Czech nuclear power plants; problems with the implementation of gas infrastructure projects aimed at further diversification of gas supplies to the Czech Republic; and the strains on the Czech electric transmission network as a result of international electricity transfers and an increase in the use of intermittent renewable energy resources9.

In the future, energy security can be and hopefully will be reinforced namely by reducing the dependency of oil and gas supplies from a single source. This call is even more important given that Russia has chosen its energy strategy as a political tool used at the international level that serves for building or renewing, to some degree, Russia’s global power status. In light of the above, it would be also highly desirable to look for alternative transport routes for the existing suppliers followed by the diversification and search for new energy producers.

Compared to many other European countries10, raw material and energy security in the Czech Republic is at a relatively good level. What is quite worrying though is the fact that a vast majority of the measures that determine this solid level of raw material and energy security was adopted in the past and, therefore, today we are reaping the fruits of the right strategic decisions made in the previous decades. The area of the energy security and, in particular, the raw material security of the Czech Republic provides enough room for further strengthening in individual segments. To implement this though, it is necessary to start looking at this strategic area as an area of the public interest11.

It is true – and it is probably a step in the right direction – that efforts are being made to achieve diversification of energy resources, but a question remains how this can be achieved, because in the Czech Republic’s geographical context the only option is to build larger gas storage facilities. Without doubt, a more relevant issue is the search for energy savings and effective use of energy resources.

The main problem in the development of renewable resources or green energy is the natural conditions of the Czech Republic, which do not allow for further extensive development of these resources. Another issue with renewable resources is the possibility of destabilising the energy network and power outages in the national grid caused by the random character of supplies into the grid. Installation of some renewable energy resources (especially wind and solar power plants) has its technical limits concerning the extent to which they can participate in the performance of the energy network. The support for renewable energy resources in the Czech Republic should be to some extent limited, while acknowledging that the benefits of these energy resources will not be seen until after many years.

Another important aspect is to achieve some form and degree of decentralisation of the energy system to prevent a situation where, for example, one cyber attack puts the entire transmission network out of order, and to reinforce the energy transmission system in the public interest to minimise the risk of blackouts.

In the light of the above, it seems advisable to strengthen the role of nuclear energy in the Czech Republic’s energy mix and to use and perhaps even increase the current production of nuclear power plants based on technologies of some EU countries (Germany, France). Energy security would also be surely reinforced by the Czech Republic having its own reserves of nuclear fuel, i.e. by continuing the uranium mining.

Secondly, there should also be appropriate endeavours undertaken to use the country’s own energy resources, while realistically assessing their potential use. The country should start assessing and using the possibility of exploiting (even in the future) its reserves of lignite and coal. In an ideal scenario, the country should prevent the situation when there will be impossible access to raw materials e.g. by constructing buildings in areas where raw materials are available.

Another recommendation on how to increase energy security in the Czech Republic is, in my opinion, the creation and promotion of the full liberalisation and functioning of markets and an effective legal regulation of non-competitive markets.

As the main guarantor of the Czech Republic’s energy security, the State should through the SEP clearly communicate to energy companies its long-term strategy and priorities for energy security. This would eliminate the current uncertainty, which undermines investment in the energy sector and poses a threat to the country’s energy security. The current trend of postponing important political decisions only exacerbates the problems of the Czech energy sector and reduces possibility of their resolution12.

3. Using renewable energy resources

The Act on the Environment13, does not use the term “renewable energy resources” (hereinafter referred only as the “RER” or “RR”), but the term “renewable natural resources” which, according to Section 7 of this Act, have “the ability, when gradually consumed, to be restored partially or completely by themselves or with human contribution.” The legal regulation on environmental protection (the environmental law) is an essential branch of law influencing the use of renewable energy resources; precisely because these resources are a part of nature and use of renewable resources should be primarily subjected to environmental protection. Only in those cases, when there is no harm to the environmental protected fields (basically all nature), then any kind of support (e.g. financial, administrative) should be used.

The definition of renewable resources is based on the Directive on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Resources14; however, the Czech legislation use different definition of the RR for the purposes of their support, because this definition takes into consideration the country’s geographical location, and the definition does not include energy from oceans. It is evident that considering the geographic and geological conditions in the Czech Republic, it is impossible to use all these resources or, in other words, it is possible, to a limited extent, potentially use only some of them.

The growth in the use of renewable energy is hindered especially by the relatively high price of this energy compared to the price of energy obtained from traditional sources. There are two ways of increasing the use of RR. Either to let the market forces decide whether renewable energy can compete with other energy sources, or to contribute, through government interventions on the energy market with electricity, to the achievement of predefined volume of energy from RR to be used in a certain period. The current economic policy of the EU prefers the later, as most policy makers are convinced that the market by itself is not able to drive effectively an increase in the significance of renewable energy in the energy balance sheets of individual countries15.

The basis for the use of RR is Article 7 of the Czech Republic’s Constitution and the Act on the Environment. Then there is the Act on supported energy sources16, which along with other laws applicable to specific RR defines the fundamental conditions for the use of RER, especially in terms of supporting their use and defining the relationship or conflict with the principles of environmental protection.

Section 32 of the Act on the Environment provides a non-exhaustive list of positive tools of environmental protection and in fact implements Article 7 of the Constitution. It states that entities utilising natural resources can be granted tax and levy reliefs or provided with loans or subsidies in accordance with the principle of permanently sustainable development17. On the contrary, negative stimulation is referred to in Section 31 of the Act on the Environment, stating that specific taxes, fees, levies and other payments will be imposed for polluting the environment. These provisions are a core prerequisite for special regulations, which further specify the positive or negative stimulation, among other, with regard to the use of RR.

According to the Act on Supported Energy Sources and the Energy Act18, supported renewable resources are “renewable non-fossil natural sources of energy, i.e. wind energy, solar energy, geothermal energy, water energy, soil energy, air energy, biomass energy, landfill gas energy, sludge gas energy from wastewater treatment plants and biogas energy”. In this case, the definition focuses on specific energy sources and specifies that these sources are non-fossil, i.e. excludes sources based on carbon, originating historically in different geological periods. Renewable resources are in more detail specified in the Decree of the Ministry of Industry and Trade on Determining Types and Parameters of Supported RR19, adopted for the purposes of implementing the Act on Supported Energy Sources. No support is provided for peat bogs, as they constitute an important landscape feature and they are protected against damage and destruction.

The EU law defines the protection of competition against negative impact of public support both by primary and secondary laws. While public support is not forbidden per se, it is considered as incompatible with the EU’s single market, with some types of support absolutely or conditionally exempted20. In the Czech Republic, public support in the area of environmental protection is used quite often.

According to the Report on the Environment of the Czech Republic from 201121, there had been a positive increase in the production of electricity from RR, which was mainly driven by the extensive public support for renewable energy generation, as reflected especially in the massive photovoltaic boom. This support had resulted in an increase in the price of electricity for consumers, but the share of RR in the total energy production remained low. The high proportion of fossil resources in the production of energy in the Czech Republic and emissions from local furnaces, especially in small settlements, was a lingering problem. In the Report from 201422, it was already stated that the energy and material intensity of the Czech economy was decreasing. A slight decrease has been registered in the emissions of greenhouse gases and emissions of polluting substances. The share of steam power plants, which burn mainly lignite, is also decreasing, while the proportion of RR and nuclear energy is growing. The new support for photovoltaic production is focused on households.

3.1. Means and forms of support of the use of energy from renewable resources

While the means of support of the use of energy from RR may be of a various nature, the most crucial and important are various forms of public support, especially in the area of environmental protection. This may, for example, include support from the viewpoint of environmental protection to obtain more easily various permits for the activities of entities that use RR, which is regarded as an administrative tool. Support is also provided in the form of state guarantees for private loans or purchase of goods and services under preferential terms or in the form of financial support, either directly through subsidies, or through tax or fee reliefs, which is regarded as an economic tool.

However, support can be regarded as compatible with the single market only if it covers the difference between the costs of the production of energy from RER and the market price of the relevant type of energy, if its amount is limited to the strict minimum and if it is non-discriminatory and reasonable. When using RR, the most important tools are administrative and economic.

3.1.1. Administrative tools

These tools are used mainly for planning, assessing and permitting various activities related to the use of energy from RR, of which the biggest attention is devoted to the placement of structures or facilities for the production of renewable energy. The most important tools are the obligation of preferable connection and the quotas on biofuels used in transport.

The obligation of preferable connection is defined in Section 7 of the Act on Supported Energy Sources. It is the obligation of the operator of the transmission system or the operator of the distribution system to connect to the system of a plant generating electricity from a supported source for the purposes of electricity transmission or distribution (if the producer requests so and fulfils the conditions specified in Decree No. 51/2006 Coll. of the Energy Regulatory Office)23. An exception to this rule is a provable lack of capacity of the facility to transmit or distribute or a danger (threat) to the safe and reliable operation of the power system. The purpose of the quota on biofuels is to ensure a minimum quantity of biocomponents in the fuels released into free circulation.

As regards spatial planning, there is a very interesting fact. The facilities for the production of renewable energy are not regarded as public technical infrastructure, but as production facilities. Thus, they cannot be defined in the zoning documentation as publicly beneficial structures, which could lead to expropriation. In most cases, they cannot be situated in the undeveloped parts of municipalities24.

3.1.2. Economic tools

The main purpose of economic tools is to introduce charges on the economic (business) use of natural resources and to provide financial incentives for the uses of natural resources in line with the principle of sustainable development. To be specific, these incentives include the minimum feed-in tariffs (this was most evident in the support for photovoltaic power plants – hereinafter referred to as “PVPP”), the so-called green bonuses, tax incentives (benefits), tax deterrents and subsidies.

(a) Green bonuses and feed-in tariffs

The green bonus is an amount intended to support the production of electricity, biomethane or heat and targeted at the producers of electricity from RR and producers of biomethane or heat. The Energy Regulatory Office in a pricing decision defines the scope and amount of most of the aforementioned forms of support.

(b) Tax incentives and deterrents

This is the least significant tool of support for RER, but is regarded as the least negative in terms of impact25. As regards the real property tax, structures serving for the operation or production of energy from RR and/or structures or units are exempted from this tax for a period of five years after a change of heating method by making a shift from fossil fuels to the system using RER26.

Tax deterrents include energy taxes on natural gas, on fossil fuels and electricity27. A specific deterrent is a levy on electricity from sunlight (the so-called “solar tax”) defined in Division IV of the Act on Supported Energy Sources.

(c) Subsidies

This is the most important form of support for the use of energy from RR. For example, a subsidy is provided to a market operator as a reimbursement for the costs related to the support for electricity from supported resources, heat from RR and biomethane. Another option is “EFEKT”, the state programme in support of energy savings and use of renewable energy resources. It is possible to receive subsidies, loans or contributions from the State Environmental Fund of the Czech Republic according to Directive No. 6/2010 of the Ministry of the Environment28. Another programme is Zelená úsporám (“Green Savings”) and Nová zelená úsporám (“New Green Savings”), which promotes installation of heating sources using RER and investment in energy savings in both renovated and new buildings. The Czech Republic has risen the funding for this programme mainly by selling emission credits under the Kyoto Protocol on the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases.

The support for the use of renewable energy has been often criticised. The criticism focused mostly on the support provided through feed-in tariffs, which has been labelled as “economically unsustainable and morally unjustifiable”, because the total costs (approximately 70% concerns the support for PVPP) have resulted in higher prices of electricity for all customers. Electricity generation in photovoltaic and wind power plants is regarded as the most expensive way of reducing the CO2 emissions generated by electricity production29. Very significant legislative changes were made in 2010, which were mainly aimed to cut support for large photovoltaic power plants situated on agricultural land. This culminated in the introduction of the so-called solar tax, which is a levy imposed on electricity produced from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013 at plants put into operation between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010. That is exactly the period of the largest boom of PVPP in the Czech Republic driven by feed-in tariffs which were very attractive for electricity producers and which led to a large-scale construction of the PVPP.

The author believes that the support for the PVPP is very inappropriate, as this kind of support can never lead to the generation of significant volumes of energy given the Czech Republic’s geographical location. In addition, these plants occupy large sections of agricultural land and no one really knows how to dispose in an environmentally friendly way (if at all) of the fields covered by solar panels.

It is believed that the only realistically available RER in the Czech Republic is biomass for the needs of cogeneration plants. Its use is actually promoted through investment incentives such as the replacement of the combustion source, what eventually brings some control over the desirable technological standard of plants and control over emissions.

As regards economic support, the currently prevailing trend is a shift from the system of feed-in tariffs to the more market-defined green bonuses. One can agree with this trend, because the general support for RER should be rather lowering, supplementary and rather subdued.

4. Conclusions

The energy policy and strategy of the Czech Republic over the recent years has not brought any new ways or directions and the policy appears to be consistent. Energy policy and security has reached “higher level”, i.e. from the viewpoint of energy suppliers, infrastructure has been improved and dependence on Russia as a single source has been reduced.

The Czech Republic is, to a significant extent, tied by various international commitments, especially as regards the environment. It is therefore, in my opinion, impossible to build an energy policy from a scratch and devise “one’s own way” while disregarding international obligations. Due to certain limits set by international treaties and commitments, it is impossible to implement a policy of energy security based on the state’s own reserves. As a result, in my view, it may be argued that the country’s sovereignty in the area of energy security may be considered as too excessively restricted.

International commitments in relation to the exploitation of natural resources are significant elements that ensure a balance between the need to ensure energy security and environmental protection.

It should be noted that natural resources, especially the fossil ones, would surely run out one day. Further intensive mining and high energy consumption at the expense of the environment may speed up this process. Therefore, energy security may not be achieved by having a sufficient energy reserves and exploiting conventional energy resources, but by searching for new and alternative resources and by effectively using and consuming the currently existing resources.

The main goals of the Czech Republic’s energy policy should be attained through a stable, balanced and financially feasible system of subsidies and taxes.

In terms of energy security, in my view, the best option for the Czech Republic is nuclear energy, which is a real, effective, long-term and, at the same time, the most environmentally friendly source of energy. There are only two dangerous factors concerning nuclear energy – the human factor and the factor of natural conditions. The human factor can be prevented by a system of cutting-edge technologies and control mechanisms that eliminate the possibility of human failure. As regards the factor of natural conditions, there is no such problem in the Czech Republic.

For the reasons presented in this chapter, the concept of the Czech Republic’s energy security should ideally continue to follow the current direction and strategy. Namely to ensure, on the one hand, sufficient supplies of energy from a variety of sources, and via a variety of transit routes and, on the other hand, to ensure the key infrastructure for these sources, including energy transit routes. This should be achieved by (i) using quality technologies and materials and through protection against undesirable natural influences and the human factor; as well as (ii) virtually or cybernetically – because most of the industry is controlled through information technologies and, therefore, a sufficient security of information systems is a major component of the overall energy security. In the author’s opinion, this security is at a very solid level in the Czech Republic.

One of the ways of ensuring and supporting energy security may be the use of renewable energy resources. In my opinion, in the Czech Republic this option is not a solution when it comes to obtaining new sources of energy because of the obligations under international treaties, geographical conditions and, at the same time, because of consumption, energy needs and the full capacity use of the energy system.

The National Action Plan30 has identified areas, which, if properly implemented, should accelerate and simplify the integration of RER and other resources into energy systems by specifying a simplified process for the construction and update of energy structures. The drafted National Action Plan proposes (assumes) that in 2020 the country will reach a 15.3% share of energy from renewable resources in gross final energy consumption and a 10% share of energy from renewable resources in gross final consumption in the transportation sector. It is questionable whether the mandatory share of RER in gross final energy consumption is not contradictory with the requirements for protecting the elements of the environment and for complying with the planned state budget deficit as a share of the GDP.

However, in general, in my point of view, providing across-the-board subsidies for “green energy” is definitely not advisable in the long-term perspective and, under the influence of economic forces. On the contrary, what seems to be very appropriate is to promote, for example, the use of sunlight energy as a source for low output on buildings and, to a limited extent, the use of geothermal energy. I also believe that the funding for the support of RER should be based on energy taxes, fees and obligatory payments for externalities, which should secure enough support for a reasonable increase in the use of RER, but not at all costs.

1 JUDr., PhD., assistant professor at the Law Faculty of Masaryk University (Department of Financial Law and Economics). He specialises in economic aspects of law and Banking and Finance Law. Besides working at the university, he is also a practicing attorney.

2 D. Yergin, Ensuring Energy Security, Foreign Affairs 2006, Vol. 85, available at www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61510/daniel-yergin/ensuring-energy-security (accessed on 2 October 2016).

3 I. Beneš, Energetická bezpečnost: informační příručka, Hluboká nad Vltavou 2007, p. 5.

4 V. Prorok, [in:] Energetická bezpečnost – geopolitické souvislosti, Prague 2008, p. 15.

5 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Update of state energetic concept of the Czech Republic, available online (accessed on 2 October 2016).

6 See Act No. 406/2000 Coll.

7 Czech Statistic Authority, available at https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/spotreba-vybranych-ropnych-produktu-a-zemni-plyn-prosinec-2015.

8 E.g. that would be implemented projects to produce electricity from gas.

9 P. Binhack et al., Energetická bezpečnost ČR a budoucnost energetické politiky EU. Zkrácená verze, Prague 2010, p. 7.

10 Most energy dependant countries are islands (Malta, Ireland, Cyprus), small states (Luxemburg) and Italy.

11 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Background to the Concept of Resources and Energy Security of the Czech Republic, available at www.download.mpo.cz/get/44988/50560/583032/priloha001.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2016).

12 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Background to the Concept of Resources and Energy Security of the Czech Republic, available at www.download.mpo.cz/get/44988/50560/583032/priloha001.pdf, p. 8 (accessed on 15 September 2016).

13 Act on the environment of 5 December 199 No. 17/1992 Coll.

14 Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.

15 P. Musil, Globální energetický problém a hospodářská politika: se zaměřením na obnovitelné zdroje energie, Prague 2009, pp. 26–150.

16 Act on Supported Energy Sources No. 165/2012, as amended.

17 Concept of sustainable development is defined in § 6 of the Environment Act as “development for present and future generations, which preserves the possibility of meeting their basic needs”. All this without reducing biodiversity and it preserves the natural functions of ecosystems, but to a comprehensive approach of this concept, it is necessary to consider other related aspects.

18 Act on supported energy sources No. 165/2012, as amended; Act on business conditions and the performance of state administration in energy sectors (hereinafter referred to as the “Energy Act”) No. 458/2000, as amended.

19 Decree on determining the types and parameters supported by renewable sources to produce electricity, heat or biomethane and the establishment and preservation of documents No. 477/2012.

20 M. Janků, J. Mikušová, Veřejné podpory v soutěžním právu EU, Prague 2012, pp. 16–19.

21 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Environment Report of the Czech Republic of 2011, available at www.mzp.cz/cz/news_121213_zprava_ZP.

22 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Environment Report of the Czech Republic of 2014, available at www.mzp.cz/cz/news_151120_Zprava_o_ZP_2014.

23 Decree on conditions of connection to the electricity grid No. 51/2006 Coll., as amended.

24 Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Licensing process of renewable energy sources, pp. 38, 49 and 51.

25 P. Musil, Globální energetický problém a hospodářská politika: se zaměřením na obnovitelné zdroje energie, Prague 2009, pp. 188–189.

26 See section 9 of the Act on the tax on immovable property No. 338/1992 Coll.

27 Act on the stabilisation of public budgets No. 261/2007 Coll.

28 Directive of 2010 No. 6/2010 of the Ministry of the Environment.

29 M. Zajíček, K. Zeman, Ekonomické dopady výstavby fotovoltaických a větrných elektráren v ČR, Prague 2010, pp. 9–10.

30 Updating the National Action Plan for renewable energy sources approved by the Government in January 2016 pursuant to the Act on Supported Energy Sources.