Jonathan Edwards

Sermons

Knowledge of divine truth

Redaktor Aleksandra Liszka

© Jonathan Edwards, 2021

„Knowledgeof divine Truth” to kazanie purytanina Jonathana Edwardsa. Edwards jest jednym z najważniejszych przedstawicieli purytanizmu (chrześcijanie). Słowo purytanizm pochodzi od „purus”, czyli czysty.

ISBN 978-83-8245-946-3

Książka powstała w inteligentnym systemie wydawniczym Ridero

Wydanie skrócone

Knowledge of Divine Truth

For when for the time ye ought to he teacher, ye have need that one teach you again, which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milky and not strong meat.

These words are a complaint, which the apostle makes of a certain defect in the Christian Hebrews, to whom he wrote. Wherein we may observe. What the defect complained of is, viz. A want of such a proficiency in the knowledge of the doctrines and mysteries of religion, as might have been expected of them. The apostle complains of them, that they had not made that progress in their acquaintance with the things of divinity, or things taught in the oracles of God, which they ought to have made. And he means to reprove them, not merely for their deficiency in spiritual and experimental knowledge of divine things, but for their deficiency in a doctrinal acquaintance with the principles of religion, and the truths of Christian divinity, as is evident by several things. It appears by the manner in which the apostle introduces this complaint or reproof. The occasion of his introducing it is this: In the next verse but one preceding, he mentions Christ’s being an high priest after the order of Melchizedek: “Called of God an high priest“ after the order of Melchizedek.” This Melchizedek being in the Old Testament, which was the oracles of God, held forth as an eminent type of Christ, and the account we there have of Melchizedek containing many gospel mysteries, these the apostle was willing to point out to the Christian Hebrews. But he apprehends, that through their weakness in knowledge, and little acquaintance in mysteries of that nature, they would not understand him; and therefore breaks off for the present from saying any thing about Melchizedek. (…)

There are many things concerning Melchizedek, which contain wonderful gospel-mysteries, and which I would take notice of to you, were it not that I am afraid, that through your dulness and backwardness in understanding these things, you would only be puzzled and confounded by my discourse, and so receive no benefit; and that it would be too hard for you, as meat what is too strong. Then come in the words of the text: “For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. As much as to say. Indeed it might have been expelled of you, that you should have known enough of divinity, and the Holy Scriptures, to be able to understand and digest such mysteries: but it is not so with you. Again, the apostle speaks of their proficiency in such knowledge as is conveyed and received by human teaching; as appears by that expression. When for the time “ye ought to be teachers which includes not only a practical and experimental, but also a doctrinal knowledge of the truths and mysteries of religion.”

Again, the apostle speaks of such a knowledge, whereby Christians are enabled to digest strong meat; i.e. to understand those things in divinity which are more abstruse and difficult to be understood, and which require great skill in things of this nature. This is more fully expresied in the two next verses: for every one that useth milk, is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even thofe who, by reason of use, have their senses exercifed to discern both good and evil. (…)

We may observe wherein the fault of this defect: appears, viz. in that they had not made proficiency according to their time. For the time, they ought to have been teachers. As they were Christians, their business was to learn and gain Christian knowledge. They were scholars in the school of Christ; and it they had improved their time in learning, as they ought to have done, they might, by the time when the apostle wrote, have been fit to be teachers in this school. To whatever business any one is devoted, it may be expected that his perfection in it shall be answerable to the time he has had to learn and perfect himfelf. — Christians should not always remain babes, but should grow in Christian knowledge, and leaving the food of babes, which is milk, should learn to digest strong meat.

Doctrine

[1] komentarz: intuicyjne pojmowanie (cytat z Pisma, potem o jednej drosdze do zbawienia)

[2] revelation, natura nie zna cytaty wypisać

Koniec darmowego fragmentu książki.

Zachęcamy do zakupu pełnej wersji.